High Speed Rail

Details

Status: Active

Groups: Business and the Economy , Environmental Issues

Description

MPs have voted on funding and giving permission for a new high speed rail network, connecting at least London, Birmingham, the East Midlands, Sheffield, Leeds, and Manchester.

[Person name] voted for/against new high speed rail infrastructure

Decisions

Decisions may be read as agreeing with the policy, or being against the policy.

month decision alignment strength decision type uses powers voting cluster participant count
2013-06 High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill — Decline Second Reading against strong Division insufficent_info Medium conflict: Opposition Aye, Government No 362
2013-06 High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill — Second Reading agree strong Division insufficent_info Nominal opposition: Government Aye Opposition Weak No 357
2013-10 High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill — Third Reading agree strong Division uses_powers Nominal opposition: Government Aye Opposition Weak No 380
2014-04 High Speed Rail (London — West Midlands) Bill — Decline Second Reading against strong Division insufficent_info Multi-party against: Government No, Opposition divided 501
2014-04 High Speed Rail (London — West Midlands) Bill — Second Reading agree strong Division insufficent_info Cross party aye 493
2016-03 High Speed Rail (London — West Midlands) Bill — Third Reading agree strong Division uses_powers Cross party aye 441
2018-01 High Speed Rail (West Midlands — Crewe) Bill — Second Reading — High Speed 2 Phase 2 — Fradley to Crewe agree strong Division uses_powers Nominal opposition: Government Aye Opposition Weak No 307
2019-07 High Speed Rail (West Midlands — Crewe) Bill — Third Reading — Phase 2a of HS2 — Fradley Wood to Crewe agree strong Division uses_powers Nominal opposition: Government Aye Opposition Weak No 280
2021-12 Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan agree strong Division uses_powers Low participation vote 139