Police and Crime Commissioners

Policy description

Elected Police and Crime Commissioners are individuals responsible for the strategic direction and oversight of the police in England and Wales.

Pamela Nash generally voted against (16% aligned) the introduction of elected Police and Crime Commissioners.

Comparable Labour MPs consistently voted against (0% aligned).

Scoring divisions are used to calculate the headline alignment between a person and a policy.

To suggest amendments or new votes for inclusion, please use this feedback form.

Guide to columns

person vote: the vote cast by the person
party alignment: how aligned this vote was with other members of the person’s party. Higher numbers indicate less difference from the average vote of the party.
policy direction: if an aye vote is aligned or against the overall policy.
policy alignment: if this MP’s vote was aligned with the policy.

motion	date	person vote	party alignment	policy direction	policy aligned
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Decline Second Reading	2010-12-13	aye	100%	against	not aligned
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Money	2010-12-13	no	100%	agree	not aligned
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Third Reading	2011-03-31	absent	na	agree	na
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Clause 1 — Police and Crime Commissioners	2011-09-12	absent	na	agree	na

Informative votes are thematically related to a policy, but do not count towards the overall score.

motion	date	person vote	party alignment	policy direction	policy aligned
Opposition Day — Crime and Policing	2010-09-08	aye	100%	against	not aligned
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — New Clause 4 — Inquiry Before Introducing Police and Crime Commissioners	2011-03-30	aye	100%	against	not aligned
Opposition Day — Police and Crime Commissioners	2011-05-23	aye	100%	against	not aligned
Police and Crime Commissioners — Election Rules	2012-07-04	no	100%	agree	not aligned