House of Commons – Sept. 1, 2026 – a.141.1.3

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation

Result

✅ Motion approved without vote.

Parliamentary analysis

As collective decisions, we can't provide breakdown analysis for agreements.

Agreements may represent unanimous decisions, or not opposed where an outcome is predetermined and time can be spent elsewhere.

Motion

Motion type: Other(?)

I beg to move, That this House notes the critical threat that Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) pose to press freedom, public interest research, and the right of citizens and campaigners to speak out on matters of public concern;

recognises that SLAPPs predominately target individuals, including private citizens, utilising novel legal tactics, with the weaponisation of libel law and data protection claims and the aggressive use of injunctions, which often come hand in hand with other forms of harassment including smear campaigns and surveillance;

further recognises that the anti-SLAPP provisions within the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 are ineffective due to their complexity and insufficient due to their narrow focus on economic crime;

further notes the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) view that the ‘main way to address the problem of SLAPPs is through a robust legislative solution that gives the courts more powers’, and that SRA regulation will inevitably be severely limited absent a new law;

highlights concerns over the suppression of public interest information and acts of public participation in the absence of a universally applicable anti-SLAPP law;

and also recognises the urgent need for the Government to find a legislative vehicle for simple, comprehensive anti-SLAPP provisions that filter out abusive lawsuits swiftly and fairly.

Motion in TheyWorkForYou

Annotations

No annotations for this decision.