House of Commons – Jan. 16, 2025 – b.607.0.2

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

Result

✅ Motion approved without vote.

Parliamentary analysis

As collective decisions, we can't provide breakdown analysis for agreements.

Agreements may represent unanimous decisions, or not opposed where an outcome is predetermined and time can be spent elsewhere.

Motion

Motion type: Other(?)

I beg to move, That this House notes that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) continues to need substantial reform, as recognised by the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS), with patient safety concerns persisting and exacerbating since the review’s publication in 2020;

believes that the MHRA’s 2017 expert working group report on Primodos was deeply flawed, with IMMDS later concluding the drug had caused avoidable harm;

further notes that the yellow card system for reporting suspected adverse drug reactions is failing, with no process for following up on serious or fatal reactions and conflicts of interest, with 75% of the MHRA’s funding being derived from industry fees, a concern raised in the Fourth Report of Session 2004-05 of the Health Committee, The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry, HC 42-I, published on 5 April 2005;

also notes the MHRA’s delayed response to reports of myocarditis, pericarditis and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia following covid-19 vaccination, despite action from regulators in other countries;

and calls on the Government to fully implement the recommendations in the IMMDS review and to acknowledge the harm done to patients and the financial burden on the healthcare system as a result of the MHRA’s widespread regulatory failures.

Motion in TheyWorkForYou

Annotations

No annotations for this decision.